Our website has detected that you are using an outdated browser that will prevent you
from accessing
certain features. An upgrade is recommended to improve you browsing experience.
State dependence of the Phillips curve: what does this mean for monetary policy?
Published Date:
2025-06-12
Author:
Anis Foresto, Monique Reid and Jeffrey Rakgalakane
Last Modified Date:
2025-06-12, 09:53 AM
Category:
Publications > Working Papers | What's New
The post-pandemic inflationary surge again challenged our views on the Phillips curve. International evidence that the Phillips curve is non-linear is supported by micro-evidence that agents are attentive to inflation once it passes a threshold. Beyond this threshold, inflation expectations are slow to fall, steepening the Phillips curve. Using a self-exciting threshold autoregressive model, we determine that the slope of the Phillips curve in South Africa is state dependent (2000–2024). The threshold is best described as a range between 4.28% and 9.29%, with a mean of 5.55%. We find low-inflation regimes to be self-stabilising as the probability of remaining in this regime exceeds the probability of transitioning to a high-inflation regime. Our findings have implications for discussions about the appropriate level of the inflation target. We recommend that the inflation target should fall low enough that a routine-sized supply shock does not push inflation deep into the threshold range (red zone). Considering the size of oil price shocks typically experienced in South Africa, we argue that a target of 3.37% would be just low enough to offer a buffer to accommodate the direct effect of standard-sized shocks without entering the red zone. Our results therefore support the position of Honohan and Orphanides (2022) that the South African Reserve Bank should target inflation of 3%.